Issues:

    1]	Dependency on resolution of cmdk/sd?  The minutes seem to call out
	a dependency on resolving this issue.  No ARC case has been submitted.
	There is no reason to hang that dependency on this header file case
	except as a convience.

	Does the ARC wish to continue to place this requirement?  Note that
	this will result in a knashing of teeth because of schedule
	implications.

	[I'm writting the prototype opinion with the dependency.]

    2]	The use of the fdisk partitioning was approved under the auspice
	of ``multiple OS support''.  The Solaris (and NT) implementations
	have evolved such that the fdisk partitioning remains, but the
	``multiple OS support'' was lost.  I'm not sure we have much
	choice here, but not being an expert on the PROM, I'm not sure.

	Steve's description was:

	If the firmware on the machines that we MUST support (both with current
	and anticipated contracts) can't boot Solaris, then we're out of the
	PowerPC business.  Non-Open-Firmware systems boot the 0x41 partition
	specified in the fdisk table; Open Firmware systems boot a file from a
	DOS FAT filesystem specified in an fdisk table.  In either case, the
	disk must be fdisk-partitioned. Without an fdisk table, one won't be
	able to boot on ANY PowerPC system that we have heard of.

	Does anyone else want to dig more into this, or is the previous
	acceptance still OK?

	[I can't guess what this will be, so I'm leaving the opinion blank
	at the moment.  I believe that the use of fdisk partitioning is
	a given, but the number of partiontions consumed by Solaris and
	the identification of those partitions seems open for discussion.]

    3]	The use of the x86 form of the VTOC was ``approved without setting
	a precident'' for use on a little-endian PPC port.  There is a
	possibility that the port may become big-endian.  Does anybody
	believe that this would revoke the approval.

	[Because the minutes are clear, I'm writing the opinion such that
	this is only approved if the port is little endian.

---- the following aren't really issues, but changes/additions since
---- earlier reviews.

    4]	Note that I have changed __va_copy() to va_copy() hidden when
	the appropriate standards are in effect. 

    5]	The interfaces with the compiler __builtin*, are something I
	discovered in looking into this and simply documented.